LinkedIn-led B2B programme · Nov 2026 – Apr 2027

Six months, 72 posts

72 posts across two tracks, about three a week. Click a status to track progress, open a post to edit its copy or add a comment. Everything saves to a shared tracker, so everyone with this link sees the same plan.

0 / 72posts done
0in progress
–next post
₹0spent on LinkedIn

Click a post to open it in the list, where its copy and comment can be edited.

Ad hoc posts

Festival, event and other one off posts. They sit outside the 72 and are not counted in the plan.

LinkedIn spend

One paid line, LinkedIn only, under ₹50,000 a month. Planned figures are proposals, to be cleared by Avartan. Enter the actual spend at each month end.

MonthPlannedActualCap left

Measures

Record the baseline in Month 1, then the latest figure each month. Targets are proposals to recalibrate after one full month of data.

MeasureTargetBaselineLatest

Before any post goes out

One post from each track, written out

Presence-track long-form follows the structure the founder approved: a vivid scenario, the stakes, a reframing line, the capability, and a CTA aimed at one reader. Adaptation-track posts are short: one visual plus a caption. The product-shot imagery from the founder’s reference format is replaced by the client’s studio format: a dark ground, an exploded or cutaway render of AVARTAN SRM and amber callouts, made by WizKen.

A motor is a magnet, some copper, and a supply chain most designers never see. By most estimates, around 90% of the world’s rare-earth processing sits in a single geography. For a product line planning years of production, that isn’t a background detail. It is a dependency. Magnet prices swing. Export rules change. A design that leans on one corridor inherits every one of those risks. Reliability at scale is not only an engineering property. It is a supply-chain property. Reluctance-motor technology removes the magnet from the design entirely: no rare earth in the motor, no exposure in the bill of materials. That has been the through-line of thirteen years of R&D and more than twenty patents at Avartan: performance without the dependency. For engineering and sourcing teams planning their next drive, it is a question worth asking before the design is frozen, not after. Avartan | Efficiency without dependency

Source the ~90% figure before this goes out. No product, no application, no customer — the science only.

Headline on the image
“Zero magnet dependency. Zero exposure.”
Sub-line
No mine. No magnet. No dependency.
Visual device
Supply-chain node diagram — three grey nodes, a broken link, one lit Avartan node. No map, no product.
Fixed elements
Segment tag “Switched reluctance motors”, one logo lockup, “Switched reluctance, ready to adapt.” bottom-left, progress ring bottom-right (one more segment lit than the last post).
Caption · OEM angle
“No magnets in the drive, so no exposure to the rare earth supply chain.”
Caption · consumer angle (use instead, never both)
“Why a modern fan need not depend on imported magnets.”
Stays out
Opened-up motors, lamination close-ups or design geometry beyond what the website shows · any OEM’s finished or branded product · a finished fan in a styled room · any customer name or OEM date · real internal engineering imagery that hasn’t had the same review as a render.